From 8ea12ac08d7e0bd72af4cd05bd9d277700725209 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Victor Wagner Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:42:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] *** empty log message *** --- doc/distributed-comments.txt | 325 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 325 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/distributed-comments.txt diff --git a/doc/distributed-comments.txt b/doc/distributed-comments.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0d59c74 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/distributed-comments.txt @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@ + V. Wagner + March,2008 + + Distributed Blog Commenting Prototcol + +Status of this Memo + + I just write it. If considerable interest appear, we might submit it + to the IETF as RFC draft + +Copyright + + Copyright (c) by Victor B. Wagner, 2008 + +Abstract + + This document describes a protocol which can be used by different + blog sites and web-based RSS aggregators to exchange the comments, + made by users to the blog entries either originating on this site + or recieved from other sites. + + +1 Introduction + +1.1 Purpose of protocol + + Some blog sites are more like discussion forums. They allow reader + to comment on blog entries identifying themselfes using some + identity such as OpenID. If it is quite possible to distribute blog + entries to other (mirror) sites using protocols like RSS/Atom feeds, + to distribute load and improve availability of particular blog, + there is no way to allow users to make comments on mirror site and + distribute this comments to all other copies of same blog. + + Proposed protocol closes this gap. + +1.2 Requrements + + Sites participating in this protocol should be able to serve http + request [HTTP] and send those. + +1.3 Terminology + + The capitalized key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", + "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and + "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP + 14, RFC 2119 [TERMS]. + +2 Protocol overview + +2.1 Basic terms definition + +2.1.1 BLOG + + Blog or weblog is a web resource typically consisting of series of + messages (POSTS) which appear on the blog web-page starting from + most recent one. Each blog post can have separate web page, but it + is guaranteed, that by visiting well-known and constant blog URL + any HTTP-client would get most recent post first. + Typically web page on this URL contain some special links which + point to RSS feed of the posts, author information (FOAF) open-id + server which confirms blog owner identity etc. For the purposes of + this protocol blog is identified by this URL. + + +2.1.2 User + + User is an entity which can prove identity to at least to one of + the servers. This server can confirm this identity to other servers + with OpenID or simular means. So, comments made by the user carry + user identity verified by the server either directly or indirectly + via another server. + +2.1.3 Comment + + Piece of textual information associated with some post in the + particular blog and, may be with another comment to the same post. + +2.2 Required comment proprieties + + Each comment in the system which support this protocol MUST have + following proprieties: + +2.2.1 Comment text + + Fragment of the text which MAY contain some XHTML markup, including + references to other web resourses, including another comments, + blogs or blog posts. + +2.2.2 Globally unique identifier + + Globaly unique identifier is created by site where comment was + originally posted. It MUST contain hostname of the originating site + and some string which ensures uniqueness among other comments + originatig to this site + +2.2.3 Blog, where comment was posted to + + Original URL of blog where comment belong + +2.2.4 Blog post where comment was posted to + + Permanent URL of blog post on its originating site. This URLs + are always included into RSS/Atom feeds, so any mirror site would + have no problem determining this URL + +2.2.5 Original posting date + + Timestamp with precision of second when comment is posted + + Also comments might have following OPTIONAL properities + +2.2.6 Author + + URL of verified user identitity of user, who submitted this comment. + If idenitity was provided via OpenID or similar protocol, it MUST + have + form of URL. If user authenticated on the site, where comment was + submitted, directly it SHOULD be OpenID URL which would prove identity + of this user to other sites. + + Sites participating in this protocol MAY allow anonymous comments. + If comment is anonymous, Author propriety MUST be omitted from + this comment. + +2.2.7 Modification time + + If comment was changed after its initial submission, it MUST contain + additional timestamp specifying last change date. Servers conforming + to this protocol SHOULD allow comment author to change comments. + + There is one special case - deletion of comments. Owner of blog, + i.e. user with same identity as blog url SHOULD be able to delete + any comments in his blog. + +2.2.8 Reference to parent comment + + If site allows to comment on another comment in the blog entry, not + only blog entry itself, unique identificator of parent comment + SHOULD be recorded as comment propriety. If this propriety is + absent, any server, recieving this comment, SHOULD assume that it is + made on blog entry itself. + +3. Comment exchange protocol + +3.1 URL structure + + Any site participating in this protocol should provide following + web resouces: + +3.1.1. Blog list + + Page which lists blogs, which can be commented on this site + This page should have content type text/plain and list blog URLs + one per line + +3.1.2. Comment list + + If URL consisting of BLOG list URL, slash ("/") and blog URL is + requested via HTTP GET method, it should return text/plain list of + recent comments (most recent first) in the form + + timestamp whitespace comment-id + + one per line. + If this URL is requested with skip=number parameter (i.e. appended + with question mark, workd skip equal sign and number), it should + return list of more earlier comments. + +3.1.3 Comments itself + + If URL described in 3.1.2 is requested via POST method and POST + request body consists of list of comment identifiers, separated by + newlines, it should return text/xml data containing specified + comments using XML schema described in the section 4 of this + document. + + Comments MAY be ordered either earliest first or in order listed in + the request. + + Any conforming implementation sending the request SHOULD send + identifiers of requested comments from earliest to latest. + +3.1.4 Posting notification + + Conforming implementation should understand request to the URL 3.1.1 + either by POST by or GET method, + which contains parameter notify=blog-URL. This request means that + site sending this request wants to notify this site that it have new + comments on the specified blog. + + If blog-URL doesn't belong to this site, it MAY respond to this + request with 406 (Not Acceptable) HTTP response code. + + Otherwise it should respond with 200 response and immediately + initiate procedure of recieving comment from the site which sent + request. + + Conforming implementation SHOULD send notify requests only if + comment was posted on the site to the blog originating on the site + where request is sent, unless it is behind firewall or proxy. In + this case it MAY send such requests for each blog commented on it + to some relay site, if permitted by the relay site administrator. + + If notifying site is behind NAT or firewall and connection cannot to + it cannot be stablished, reverse protocol described in section 3.3.3 + could be used. + + +3.2 Declaring support of this protocol + +3.2.1 Declaring support in the protocol on the blog page + + Each site which supports this protocol SHOULD add link tag to its + blog pages with rel="comment-exchange" and href pointing to URL, + described in the section 3.1.1. + +3.2.2 Declaring protocol URL during comment exchange. + + Each site which performs comment exchange procedure should provide + its peers means to retrieve comments from it. This is done by adding + custom HTTP header X-Comment-Exchange-URL to all requests to + protocol pages. This header should contain URL of page described in + 3.1.1, and host name in this URL MUST resolve to the same IP address + request is made from. + + +3.3. Connect exchange procedure + +3.3.1 Procedure initiation. + + Site supporting this protocol SHOULD check presense of link + rel=comment-exchange on all sites it retrieves blog entries via + RSS/Atom. If this link is found it MAY periodically initiate comment + exchange procedure with these sites. + + It also MAY initiate this procedure with any site which was known + to initiate this protocol with it before. + + If 404 NOT FOUND HTTP response code is recieved when requesting URL + 3.1.1, this site SHOULD be removed from the list of polled sites + until either explicit user interaction or first protocol session + initiated from that site. + +3.3.2 Normal (PULL) procedure + + 1. Site requests lists of blogs from URL 3.1.1 + 2. For each blog interesting to this site, list of available + comments is requesed from URL 3.1.2. If site has reasonable + expectations that it can miss some comments, which are not + listed on first page, request page multiple times using skip + parameter. + 3. Prepare list of missing comments, earliest first and send it to + site + 4. Repeat steps 2,3 for each blog copy of each is carried on this + site. + +3.3.3. Reverse (PUSH) procedure + + 1. Send notify request (3.1.4) using POST method with list of + available comments as specified in 3.1.3 in the POST body. + + 2. Recieve list of requested comments as text/plain resoponse to + the POST request. + + 3. Send XML stream of the comments using POST request to the same + URL with content type text/xml + + 4. Repeat steps 1-4 for each blog comments for which are to be + pushed to this site. + + when using PUSH method X-Comment-Exchange-URL header MAY be omitted. + + +4. Comment stream XML format + +4.1 Comment stream XML document have root node. + Contents of this stream is sequence of element. +4.2 Comment element should contain following elements + unique-identifier + blog-URL + post-URL + unique-identifier + url + date + date + text of comment with optional XHTML markup + Some of this elements are OPTIONAL (see section ). + +4.3. Comment deletion + If comment element contain element + and element contains either same URL as + original comment with same or URL of blog, comment + belongs to, + comment with given identifier should be removed + from the user's view, but deletion notice retained in the database + in case that same + comment would be sent from other site which didn't have recieved + deletion message yet. + + +4.4 Banning user from commenting. + If comment element contains element + identity URL instead of body or along with + element, + and comment author identity is same as + identity of blog it belongs to, it means that user with given + identity should no more be allowed to comment in this blog, and any + existing comments from this user should not be offered to other + sites, requesting comments using this protocol, even if these + comments has earlier timestamp than ban notice. + +4.5 Removing ban + + If comment element contain element + identity URL than previously set ban should be + removed. + +5. Full Copyright Statement + Would write it if document is to be submitted to the IETF as RFC + draft + + + + -- 2.39.5